M-G: 4.21.20 // Some Comments on John 3:1-21, Intro

What we have in this passage is a fascinating clandestine encounter with a Pharisee by the name of Nicodemus, a ruler of the Jews, and Jesus, taking place in an unknown location in Jerusalem under the cover of night (cf. Jn 2:23; 3:2). This meeting took place within the city proper (cf. Jn 3:22). Though Jerusalem is a part of Judea, this phrase, the land of Judea (v22), naturally has reference to rural Judea.

Instead of laying down tracks with an outline of this familiar conversation Jesus had with Nicodemus, I will simply allow things to unfold without intentionally directing any train of thought except for an employed metaphor. To be sure, there’s not a destination to be had with fare and schedule! It is more a setting aside of restrictive, interpretive borders for an anointing, a fresh oil approach if you please (Psa 92:10). There is nothing wrong with outlines, per se, but sometimes it’s good to get away from manmade fences and feel and realize the freedom we truly have in Christ, free indeed (cf. Jn 8:36)!

Naturally, we are free to roam throughout the vast pasture of God’s will, but there is a defined perimeter called the context of Scripture that is Holy Spirit-made, not by man. Choice, based on love (agape) and chastening, promote staying within the pasture, but it does not prevent us from crossing over the fence into a darkened landscape. The evil one would only draw our attention to the perimeter, not the seemingly unending grazing land. 

It was the serpent that convinced Eve to intently focus on the tree of the knowledge of good and evil to the exclusion of everything else found within the Garden of Eden and buy into the idea that God was keeping something from them; He was; it was called sin. She willingly crossed over being deceived (1 Tim 2:14; Gn 3:4, 6, 12-13; 2 Cor 11:3). Nobody is a victim to sin when rebelling against God, knowingly or unknowingly.

No one is going to argue that John 3:16 is one of the great summits of Scripture. This let out to pasture approach here in our passage under consideration is being presented as taking a climbing expedition with friends who have a passion for ascending summits of breathtaking spiritual truths as found on the Summit of St. John 3:16. This is the teaser, the rush, the challenge, and the satisfaction of our passage to make that ascent.

We will hang around basecamp for a while (vs. 1-13); then our thoughts will make a rapid ascent beginning in vs.14 when Jesus pivots to being elevated, and we finally reach the summit in vs.16. From that vantage point, if the weather is clear (predicated on where we are at spiritually when we arrive there), we should see things in vs.17-21 from a different perspective that cannot be seen at lower elevations, figuratively speaking. The absence of an outline does not mean there is no direction! We do have to go up, yes? If you are thinking this is in itself an outline for argument’s sake, try and think of it as more of a metaphorical map to get us to the top, our spiritual Sherpa, who goes by the name of Metaphor; go figure.

I might need to mention that once we reach the top of the summit, the atmosphere, the air, and the view are marvelous, indeed, but there is one particular viewpoint that is deeply disturbing! Looking south (poetic license), we will see the valley of the shadow of death and the behavior of its inhabitants according to Jesus. On my many visits to this summit, I never allow that dark reality down in the valley to deter me from my time spent on the Summit of St. John 3:16. 

It helps me keep things in perspective with the relentless spiritual warfare raging throughout the earth and reminds me of the devil, the world system, and the flesh that war against my soul and the need for God to be in the forefront of my thoughts, tongue, and actions! Oh, if sin was limited to only that valley below, but it is merely metaphorical to the world at large. Notwithstanding, the ripple effect of the fall of man must run its course to its final conclusion.

When I am on this summit, I am reminded of the admixture of joy and suffering, peace and turmoil, rest and struggle, life and death. Not to overshadow the joy of being on higher ground, but when we reach vs.15, we will find a preamble of the great resolution of mankind’s predicament with sin on our way to the top that remedies that once for all. It is that great solution that brings me back up here time and time again. I love to pay this summit a visit in spite of the evil in the world. It causes me to ponder on the great love (agape) God the Father had/has for mankind and the great sacrifice of His Son on our behalf to make salvation available to whoever believes. It refreshes my resolve to worship and serve Him the more in spite of the dreaded effects of sin all around us!  

Should you choose to start this journey with me, you have to watch out for those deep and perilous crevasses of ailing attitudes: no need to climb, knowing everything, nothing of value here, non-committal, been there done that, lack of discipline, offended easily, unteachable spirit, and arrogance. Those attitudes never truly help anyone reach the top; they are suddenly swallowed up by the earth. If you are tethered to those kinds of folk, they usually take you with them! I make it a practice to maintain a spirit of learning from all walks of life, young and old. The good thing is we do not have to lug any O2 bottles during our ascent, if the Holy Spirit lives within the heart, that is. If He doesn’t, O2 bottles will not help you anyway (1 Cor 2:14)!

Before gearing up at basecamp, when we add up all of the recorded words of this conversation between Jesus and Nicodemus from the NKJV translation, the tallies are these: Nicodemus (54, 14.6%) and Jesus (315, 85.4%).1 Naturally, the conversation between Jesus and Nicodemus was not limited to only these amount of words, but what we have is the gist of it. The Bible is large enough as it is that most people will not read it from cover to cover. If all were included, it would be certain that the Bible would never be read in its entirety by the masses (cf. Jn 20:30; 21:25), but up against this backdrop, what has been written is sufficient for all who would know of its contents (cf. Jn 20:31).

Jesus dominated the conversation, which was the point of this word count. Nicodemus comes across as having questions that expose the spiritual condition of his soul, but it also reveals a man ready to listen because the miracles Jesus was performing were compelling (authenticating Jesus as truly the long-awaited Messiah as prophesied by the OT prophets) and could not be dismissed if one is intellectually honest. Nick was unaware that God the Father was drawing him to His Son (cf. Jn 6:44). It is wiser for us to listen to Jesus more rather than being heard, yes? If we listen more and read more Scripture, we might just learn something on this hike up to the Summit of St. John 3:16?  

Because Nicodemus was a Pharisee (Jn 3:1), I want to provide you with some general info on the two religious factions making up the Sanhedrin, the supreme judicial and religious authority of Israel in Jesus’ day: the Pharisees and the Sadducees; the latter is not mentioned in our passage. This is rather academic and straightforward, but it will provide a better understanding of Nicodemus’ world and his theological bent before going to base camp. In some sense, you can say that the Pharisees were the conservative arm of the Sanhedrin, and the Sadducees were the liberal counterpart.


The Pharisees

1. Though they were in the minority in the Sanhedrin, the Pharisees held greater sway with the people; they were of a middle businessmen status and mingled among the people, unlike the Sadducees.

2. The Scripture records conversions of the Pharisees (Jn 3:1; Acts 9:15; 15:5).

3. They believed that all of our OT was inspired by God (Genesis-Malachi), but also they treated their centuries-old oral traditions with equal authority with the Scriptures, claiming it was rooted in Moses, which, by the way, is a clear violation of Deut 4:2. Jesus accused them of rejecting and nullifying the commandments of God by the keeping of their tradition (Mk 7:9, 13);  they didn’t like that. Here are a few examples below pertaining to the Sabbath.

A. Some of them held that a woman should not look into the mirror on the sabbath for fear that she might be tempted to pluck a gray hair from her head and be guilty of working on the sabbath day (BNTC on John 3).

B. Allowed to swallow vinegar for a sore throat, but not allowed to gargle for that would be deemed as working on the sabbath (Ibid).

C. An egg laid on the sabbath could only be eaten if the hen was killed (Ibid).

D. Read John 5:9-10. There is a word for it, unbelievable! Jesus revealed the right interpretation of the sabbath; it was made for man, not man for the sabbath (Mk 2:27). They didn’t take too kindly to the Messiah’s interpretation of the Sabbath.

4. They externalized their religion through the observances of rules, rituals, ceremonies, outward conformity to the law, hypocritical public exhibitions, holier-than-thou attitudes (Mt 5:20; 16:6, 11-12; 23:1-39; Lk 18:9-14), and honoring God with the lips but the heart was far removed. They took hypocrisy to a level lower than thought possible. They were so painstaking in publicizing their religiosity that their fastidiousness became hyper-fastidiousness to supersonic scrupulosity. Don’t ask me to translate that! They were, in two words, self-righteous retentive.

5. Believed in the resurrection of the dead (Acts 23:6).

6. Believed in rewards and punishments in the afterlife.

7. They were more religious than political.

8. Produced Gamaliel, Saul (later Paul), and Josephus (first-century historian).

The Sadducees

This was the other sectarian group that comprised the majority of the seats of the Sanhedrin. This faction tended to be from the upper class and occupied powerful positions as chief priest and high priest. They were more concerned with politics than religion, particularly in maintaining the Pax Romana (Latin for Roman peace) in order to maintain their wealth and status in Israel. They were, figuratively speaking, in bed with the Romans, the bread and butter of their lifestyle.

Some other characteristics and beliefs of Sadducees are these.

1. They lived a life independent of God which is generally typical of wealthy people.

2. They denied any resurrection of the dead, spiritual or physical (Mt 22:23; Mk 12:18; Acts 23:8).

3. They denied the spirit world of angels and demons; these guys were not supernaturalists by any stretch of the imagination (Acts 23:8).

4. They accepted the Pentateuch as only inspired by God, not the writings or the prophets (our Joshua through Malachi) or oral traditions.

5. Sadly, the Scriptures record no conversions of any Sadducees (Is this so surprising in light of Mt 19:24?).

6. They denied the afterlife and believed that the soul perished at death.

7. Their only concern with Jesus seemed to be their fear of Jesus disturbing the apple cart, if you please, causing a revolt and violating the Pax Romana (Roman Peace), Jn 11:48-50.


Are you ready to gear up at base camp before tackling the summit?2 <><




___________ 

1. Note: the NJKV is the default translation for M-G. I didn’t want to get into a word-count comparison between Received Text versus Majority Text or other translations. This was merely intended to be a simple observation.

2. Articles are determined by the constraint of size (ideally 1,500 words), not by any natural division, unless convenient. If comments on a verse or passage exceed the ideal, I will make parts of them though it is under the umbrella of John 3:1-21. For instance, should I have, say, 4,500 words on John 3:16, I would make it into three parts though there may be multiple articles on John 3:1-21 without parts. At times, I run into no man’s land, having no choice but to have a lengthier article rather than dividing. By the way, the main body of the first article is over 1,900 words. I mention this because some complain my articles are too long. Have they not read my FYI page that M-G is not designed for the 5-minute Christian?! If thy right arm offends thee, cut it off! : )-

Making use of the Archive is handy in keeping track and having quick access. Only those articles designated with parts will be published daily without interruption. I’m in no hurry; so, all other articles without parts are published at the author’s whim. Hey, being retired and having home projects and honey-do lists growing are infringing on my writing! It’s a jungle out there!

I strongly recommend going to the Camel icon on the Home page and subscribing through Google Feedburner in order to receive posting notifications consistently and hassle-free, as well as, reading M-G from a laptop, a larger iPad, or a declining desktop. The atmosphere is better, and there is a more natural feel interfacing with the website. “It’s just prettier and easier than viewing and reading from a smartphone,” one internet analyst told me! In the past ten years, I have had no one complain of being abused by me, but I will take you any way I can get you: subscribed or unsubscribed! Both are considered part of the M-G family. 

Thank you for considering the M-G project worthy of your time. It is all for the glory of God; I can assure you. I receive no remuneration for this labor of love; there is no expectation. My MO is freely given freely give. It does, however, cost me very precious time; I am not getting any younger. But what I know is this; any investment into the will of God is a privilege and far exceedingly worth more than any investiture on earth. Financially, out-of-pocket for Camel Lips Ministry is minimal, less than $100 per year!