M-G: 9.18.19 // Some Observations in Jonah 1:1

Sperm whale (Physeter microcephalus) illustration by Uko Gorter

(Jon 1:1) Now the word of the LORD came to Jonah the son of Amittai, saying,

Think what a blessing and an honor it would be that the Creator God of the universe approached us personally to do something for Him (cf. Psa 8:3, 4)! To read this formula in Jonah, the word of the LORD came, or something equivalent to it is common among the prophets that we quickly gloss over it. Imagine the honor it must have been to be visited by the LORD when we read that clause! It normally is a prelude to the LORD disclosing future events to His prophets, and they subsequently fulfill their prophetic office, but in Jonah’s case, it was more of commissioning than a revealing of things for the outcome was conditional.

Jonah would be personally challenged to fulfill Yahweh’s charge as well as to go outside the norm for a prophet in Israel or Judah. Jonah’s response to the divine visitation was not the reaction we would expect from a true prophet of God or a believer in performing God’s will. V1 does not provide the method of how the word was delivered to the prophet, whether by a vision, dream, a bodiless voice, a visible messenger, or a manifestation of God (theophany). 

This clause, the word of the LORD came, is found 102x in the OT. The bulk of this expression is found in Ezekiel (50x) and Jeremiah (21x) for the purpose of disclosing something future. Whether it is Yahweh Himself or an angel delivering the communique, the word carries the weight of absolute authority for it is the word of the LORD [Yahweh].

Jonah, his name means dove; it occurs 19 times in the OT (18x in Jonah). What his father, Amittai (truthful or loyal), didn’t know (provided he was alive), was that his son was about to fly the coop like a dove! Both son and father are mentioned only one other time outside of the book of Jonah in the Old Testament (2 Kgs 14:25).

Jonah was not a fictionalized Bible character, except by a liberal’s stretch of the imagination. This son of Amittai was a Galilean prophet of God of the tribe of Zebulon (Josh 19:13) to the northern kingdom of Israel during the reign of Jeroboam II (793-753 B.C.) noted for his wickedness and the expansion of his empire (2 Kgs 14:23-25). This passage helps to pinpoint Jonah’s time in biblical history but not his lifespan. The prophets Amos and Hosea were also contemporary with Jeroboam. 

There is a fuss about the historicity of Jonah, but suffice it to say at this juncture, he was as real as Jeroboam II. Do you know who has ever challenged the existence of Jeroboam II lately? Of course not, there was no fantastic element in his story, like with Jonah's a great fish (Jon 1:17); though I would have to say, Jeroboam II was a fishy character. Liberal interpreters quickly jumped on this incredulous story of a whale swallowing Jonah to press their allegorical interpretations of this account. I believe it is true simply because Jonah's story is under the inspiration of Scripture (cf. 2 Tim 3:16). Inspiration encompasses Genesis to Malachi and Matthew to Revelation (the LXVI).

Speaking of Jeroboam II, there is no record of what Jonah prophesied to him. This wicked but talented monarch extended his territories, practically rivaling that during Solomonic time, save for the territories of the southern kingdom belonging to Judah and Benjamin. Jeroboam II illustrates the truth that prosperity does not necessarily equate to being right with God, yes?

Where was Jonah when the Word of the LORD came to him? V1 does not disclose the whereabouts of Jonah. He could have been in (1) Gath-Hepher (his hometown, a few miles northeast of Nazareth, 2 Kgs 14:25), (2) Samaria (the capital city of the northern kingdom of Israel), (3) Jerusalem (the capital city of the southern kingdom of Judah), or (4) at an undisclosed location.

I am inclined to think that the word of the LORD came to Jonah while he was in Jerusalem; why there? Well, we could ask that question with any of the options concerning his location. Jerusalem makes more sense and appears to be the most logical choice; I will comment on that in v3. It brings up something very interesting, theologically and practically.  

Actually, the location of Jonah’s launch point into disobedience is really a moot point for his response would have been the same wherever the word of the LORD came to him. It wasn’t the idea of the Word of the LORD coming to Jonah that was upsetting to him but the content, but I’m jumping ahead just a pinch.

In some sense, every time we open up the Bible, the word of the LORD comes to us saying…. What is your response to God’s will? <><


PS: I just wanted to say for the record that this series on Some Observations in Jonah is not intended to cover every verse and everything that could be said, hence, “some,” to state the obvious.