M-G: 4.4.15 // The God of the Two Testaments, Part 3

As we wrap this series up with part 3, there are at least five reasons why I reject the notion that the God of the Old Testament and the God of the New Testament are different in nature. I saved the best reason for last, having to do with the nature of God.

First, any tension created between the God of the Old and the New is nothing more than eisegesis or reading something into Scripture that is not supported by the context of revelation as a whole. A telltale sign of eisegesis is that it generates conflicts and contradictions with other portions of Scripture. We can practically back up any idea from Scripture if we want to take a word, a verse, a passage, a chapter, or a book out of its immediate context or out of context with the principles of Scripture. Context is the sovereign of hermeneutics or the art and science of the interpretation of Scripture.

A clear case of this can be made of those making a distinction between God in the OT and the NT. What motivates someone to do this? In the case of wrath versus love, I believe one of the motivations is a personal aversion to accountability to God for sin bias, in my opinion. Such a position tends to see a duality between the holiness and lovingkindness of God and forces the idea of a distinction in the nature of God. Examples cited would be the mass killings resulting from the global flood (Genesis 6-8), the destruction of the cities of the plain, including Sodom and Gomorrah (Genesis 18-19), deaths of the firstborn sons in Egypt (Ex 11-12), killings of the Canaanites (Num 21:2-3; Deut 20:17; Josh 6:17, 21, and the annihilation of the Amalekites (1 Sam 15).

So it is easy to see as we move into the New Testament revelation that the idea of eternal punishment of all unbelievers is considered absurd and unthinkable to those who only see God as a God of love (Jn 3:16), who not only loves mankind but He will also save the pinnacle of His creation from destruction. Think about it; according to this theology, you can have your sin and go to heaven, too! It’s the best of both worlds! To arrive at that conclusion, however, could only happen if the teachings of Scripture and the nature of God are completely taken out of the context of biblical revelation. For a better understanding of this, I recommend reading Dr. Paul Coulter’s article on “Old Testament Mass Killings” b.

Second, all Scripture is authoritative and profitable (2 Tim 3:15-17). This may sound like Captain Obvious, but both Testaments come from the same Author who is both holy and love (2 Tim 3:16; 2 Pet 1:20-21)! Why would God present Himself as a God of anger in one section and then portray Himself as a loving God in another unless you see God as evolving somehow which is theologically warped to the hilt! God is eternal, infinite, and immutable. Scripture is viewed as a unified whole and spiritually organic (Jn 8:58; Heb 4:12; 2 Tim 3:16).

Third, Paul declared the value of reading the OT (Rom 15:4; 1 Cor 10:6, 11). Now that is an interesting thought! Though we are no longer under the old covenant, the moral laws of God transcend all and are still in force. Paul was forever battling the Judaizers who were attempting to force circumcision, Sabbath-keeping, observing the times and the seasons, and dietary laws into Christianity as a mode or proof of salvation. For any thinking that the OT is not important or relevant today because of the dominating themes of the law of Moses and God’s supposed “anger issues,” in the OT, we only have to read what Paul said in the above passages. In addition, Paul described all of Scripture (primarily the OT but inclusive of any NT writing in circulation at the time of writing 2 Timothy but ultimately including all NT writings) as “given by inspiration” or literally, God-breathed (Gk, theopneustos, contrast Titus 1:14).

The “sacred writings” (2 Tim 3:15-17, NASB) are indispensable to our spiritual welfare. These writings were written to teach or instruct us to endure and be encouraged that we might have hope (Rom 15:4). “Hope” in the NT never carries the idea of uncertainty but positive expectation or anticipation.  In addition “whatever was written in earlier times” (Rom 15:4, NASB), provides us with admonitions or warnings about the dangers of sin and disobedience (1 Cor 10:6, 11). I cannot stress how vital it is that we read and learn from the Scriptures to persevere and stay encouraged so that we might keep on having hope. There is an old Russian proverb that says that the last to die is hope. People’s hope dies when they stray from the encouragement of the Scriptures. Let’s look at some of the spiritual benefits surfacing from these three passages.

1.     Leads to salvation, “able to give you the wisdom that leads to salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus” (2 Tim 3:15).

2.     “Profitable (useful, advantageous) for doctrine” (or teaching, 2 Tim 3:16). It provides a body of truth to know the mind of God of those things that are necessary for life and godliness.

3.     “Profitable (useful, advantageous) for reproof” (2 Tim 3:16). It rebukes unscriptural belief and behavior that is displeasing to God.

4.     “Profitable (useful, advantageous) for correction” (or straightening up, 2 Tim 3:16). Restoring something to its proper condition, from spiritual error to godliness.

5.     “Profitable (useful, advantageous) for instruction (or training) in righteousness” (2 Tim 3:16), educating, training, and disciplining in godly behavior.

6.     “That the man of God (spiritual leaders and followers) may be complete (mature), thoroughly equipped (furnished) for every good work (for the challenges ahead of us and godly living), 2 Tim 3:17.

7.     “For whatever things were written before (primarily OT, inclusive of NT written and to be written) were written for our learning (or instructions)” Rom 15.4.

8.     “That we through the patience and comfort of the Scriptures (OT & NT) might have hope” (Rom 15:4).

9.     There is a plethora of examples of the dangers of sin and disobedience that serve as a warning to all of us in the OT as well as the New. It is not rocket science; obedience brings blessings and disobedience brings trouble upon us (1 Cor 10: 6, 11).

Fourth God’s response in holiness is directly the result of sin and rebellion, not because He is capricious and ill-tempered in nature (Psa 7:11; 145:8).

Fifth, the most cogent reason why the God of the two Testaments is One and the same is based on the theological truth of the immutability of God. All of God’s attributes are eternal, infinite, and immutable. In other words, God is by His very nature eternally unchanging or unchangeable without limitations (Mal 3:6, Heb 13:8; Jas 1:17).

It would be a grave mistake to underestimate God’s attitude toward sin as a believer or an unbeliever. Consider this; the world was destroyed by a global flood based on the revelation the antediluvian civilization had at the time concerning God from general revelation (Rom 1:18, 19, 20), but this was the spiritual scene of that day (Gn 6:5).

If they died with only general revelation (creation) available to them and the preaching of Noah (2 Pet 2:5), do you think it will go easier on the lost that have access to the full revelation of God today both general (creation) and special revelation (Genesis through Revelation, 66 books)? Wrath resulted in ancient times from man’s disobedience before the flood and after; one, in particular, gave the ancient world a real problem: idolatry and its attendant vices.

If God is not the same in the OT and the NT then He would be a liar (Mal 3:6). God is not a man that He should lie (Num 23:19; 1 Sam 15:29; Titus 1:2; Heb 6:18). God is reliable and unchangeable. Therefore, it can only be concluded that God is One and the same in both the Old and New Testaments.

We should never forget that we are engaged in an ancient spiritual warfare (Eph 6:12) that is as ugly as any physical warfare, deadly, and unending on this side of eternity. Things are not always going to be to our liking in this war with all the volleys of flaming arrows from the evil one (Eph 6:16). This conflict can be seen from the earliest of times to the end of times. 

Consider examples of the wrath of God in the OT and visualize the wrath of God coming down the pike according to John in the book of Revelation. Only those who truly fear God tremble and are thankful that the saints living in the Church Age (Pentecost to Rapture) will not experience God’s wrath! Eschatologically speaking, we are living in a time of grace prior to when God’s wrath will be poured out upon the earth, not by flood but by fire (Dan 12:2; Mt 24:21-22; described in detail in Revelation 6-19). The next big event is the rapture of the dead and the living in Christ; it could happen at any moment!

The God of hesed in the OT is One and the same as the God of agape in the NT. Isn’t this one of the most challenging things in being like Christ for all believers: a life of consistent holiness and love! Given the eternal, infinite, and immutable nature of God, the God of the two Testaments is One and the same. Jesus is the express image of God’s Person (Heb 1:3; Jn 10:30), the great I Am (Ex 3:14; Jn 8:58), Yahweh. <><


End of Series